Image unavailable
Stache Iwb Lower Back Holster Base Kit - Stache Iwb Lb Holster Glock 43/43x Sprgfld Hellcat Black
Our editorial team reviews specifications, product data, and field-use information to keep pages accurate.
$44.95
View on Brownells
You'll be taken to Brownells to complete your purchase.
Hunter's Outpost earns a commission from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
SKU: 100047345
Overview
Built for inside-the-waistband concealed carry, this holster base kit is aimed at users who want a modular setup for everyday carry. It is designed for Glock 43/43X and Springfield Hellcat pistols and uses impact reinforced, injection molded polymer construction. The system is intended to balance comfort, rigidity, and accessory compatibility while staying discreet under clothing. For hunters and outdoorsmen who also carry off the range, it offers a practical foundation for a personalized carry setup without unnecessary bulk.
Why Hunters Choose the Blackhawk
Inside-the-waistband Concealed
Carry use
Modular Stache
IWB system supports compatible accessories
Constructed From
Impact-reinforced, injection-molded polymer
Built Around
Comfort, rigidity, and modularity
Base Kit
Format allows accessory-based setup options
Key Features
- Inside-the-waistband holster designed for concealed carry
- Modular Stache IWB system built for everyday carry
- Constructed of impact reinforced, injection molded polymer
- Compatible with a variety of Stache IWB holster accessories
- Designed by concealed carriers for concealed carriers
- Lower back holster base kit for Glock 43/43X and Springfield Hellcat
Best Used For
- Concealed carriers wanting an inside-the-waistband holster for everyday carry
- Users seeking a modular holster system with compatible Stache IWB accessories
- Owners of Glock 43, Glock 43X, or Springfield Hellcat pistols
- Hunters and outdoorsmen needing discreet carry under layered clothing
Specifications
| Carry Position | Lower back |
|---|---|
| Color | Black |
| Compatibility | Glock 43/43X, Springfield Hellcat |
| Holster Type | Inside-the-waistband (IWB) |
| Material | Impact reinforced, injection molded polymer |
| Modularity | Compatible with a variety of Stache IWB holster accessories |
Pros
- Designed for inside-the-waistband concealed carry use.
- Modular Stache IWB system supports compatible accessories.
- Constructed from impact-reinforced, injection-molded polymer.
- Built around comfort, rigidity, and modularity.
- Base kit format allows accessory-based setup options.
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Designed for inside-the-waistband carry, so it is intended for concealed use rather than open carry or quick-access belt mounting.
- This is the base kit, so additional Stache IWB accessories may be needed to tailor the setup to your carry preferences.
- Compatibility is specific to Glock 43/43X and Springfield Hellcat, which limits use to those handgun models.
- The product is built around modularity and concealed-carry use, but the description does not provide details on fit adjustments or included accessories beyond the base kit.
Suggested Comparisons
- Inside-the-waistband concealed carry holster
- Modular holster accessory system
- Appendix carry holster
- Lower back holster
Suggested Accessories
- Holster accessories
- Belt clips
- Carry platform accessories
- Magazine carrier accessories
Frequently Asked Questions
What handguns is this Stache IWB Lower Back Holster Base Kit listed for?
The product title lists Glock 43/43X and Springfield Hellcat compatibility.
Is this holster designed for inside-the-waistband carry?
Yes. The source states that the Stache IWB holster is designed to be worn inside-the-waistband.
What material is the holster made from?
It is described as being constructed of impact reinforced, injection molded polymer.
Can this base kit be used with other Stache IWB accessories?
Yes. The description says it is compatible with a variety of Stache IWB holster accessories.
What does the source say about how this holster system compares to Kydex?
The description says the Stache IWB system is designed to outperform the design and material limitations of Kydex, but it does not provide specific test data or detailed comparisons.